Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews
Publisher: In-Sight Publishing
Publisher Founding: March 1, 2014
Web Domain: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com
Location: Fort Langley, Township of Langley, British Columbia, Canada
Journal: In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal
Journal Founding: August 2, 2012
Frequency: Three (3) Times Per Year
Review Status: Non-Peer-Reviewed
Access: Electronic/Digital & Open Access
Fees: None (Free)
Volume Numbering: 12
Issue Numbering: 3
Section: A
Theme Type: Idea
Theme Premise: “Outliers and Outsiders”
Theme Part: 31
Formal Sub-Theme: None
Individual Publication Date: August 8, 2024
Issue Publication Date: September 1, 2024
Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen
Word Count: 690
Image Credits: Cole Keister on Unsplash.
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2369-6885
*Please see the footnotes, bibliography, and citations, after the publication.*
Abstract
Dr. Alon Milwicki is a senior research analyst in the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center. Milwicki discusses: Elon Musk, Ben Shapiro, Biden; and Zionist banker Jews, Israel, and racism.
Keywords: Anti-Zionism presupposes finite Zionism definition, appease and support Israel Jews, Biden drops out, what’s happening, building cars that break on stage, debate about what makes good Jew, Elon Musk and Soros trope, finite definition of Zionism agenda, Jewish enough for antisemitic denigration.
Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews
Scott Douglas Jacobsen: Elon Musk has been described as a puppet master, and Biden has dropped out. What’s going on there? And who is this Elon Musk?
Dr. Alon Milwicki: Elon Musk has previously raged against Soros and similar figures. Let’s put it that way. For whatever reason, Elon Musk has wholly bought into the Soros trope.
I do not know his motives, but the damage it has done is astronomical, given the number of followers he has, the amount of support he has, and the fact that he was supposedly personally invited to Netanyahu’s speech. That gives him credibility that I do not believe he should be afforded because in what universe is he an expert on anything other than how to build cars that, when he throws stuff at them saying they will not break, they break on stage?
You know? So, he recently tweeted something again about Soros, and then he makes this, like, “pilgrimage” with Ben Shapiro to Auschwitz or something, as if that is somehow going to erase it. So, like anything else, like anyone else who dabbles in antisemitic tropes, there is a specific utilitarian aspect that he sees in Jewish people, and that is becoming more dominant.
I would say, Trump in America today, that there is a need to appease and support Israel and, by extension, Jews. Because if you do not, bad things will happen, or you will lose support, or you will lose money, or you will lose power because those are all the things that Jews inherently have, supposedly, if that makes sense.
Jacobsen: So what do you make of this commentary around the idea that there are good Jews and bad Jews and that the Zionist banker Jews are misleading the rest of them, so even the good ones misbehave? Moreover, that is the reality.
Milwicki: There has always been a debate about what makes a good Jew. Moreover, you will see a lot of this almost intra-party racism as well. There are different beliefs within the Jewish community about what makes you Jewish. To many people, if you do not fully support Israel, you are not Jewish.
To many people, if you do not condemn Islam, you are not Jewish. To others, if you do not observe Shabbat, you are not Jewish. You know? So, I mean, first of all, my question would be, who is labelling good Jews and bad Jews?
Put it this way: by any extension, within Jewish people, I would be labelled a bad Jew because I and religion went our separate ways when I was about 11 years old. Like, pardon my French; I do not care about religion at all. Like, it is just not my thing.
However, I am Jewish enough for antisemites. Okay? So, I am good enough for antisemites. You know? I fulfill enough qualifications to make me a Jew for people to denigrate Jewish people. Whoever creates that dichotomy has an agenda, and it is most likely speaking to that utilitarian aspect. You know?
That it is the good Jews we want to work with. It is the bad Jews we want to ostracize, and that kind of concept has existed. I just started reading this book about Zionism and some of the stuff I already knew.
However, in the early 20th century, there was such a rift on what it meant to be a Zionist and how many different kinds of Zionism there were that someone who comes up to you and says this is a finite definition of Zionism, again, has an agenda. Right?
Like, the whole concept of anti-Zionism is just ridiculous because that presupposes that there is a finite definition of Zionism, and there just is not. There just is not. So, whoever is giving you the finite definition of Zionism has an agenda and is saying that if you are not with us, you are against us.
If you are not on board with this definition, you are a bad Jew. So, my question would be, what is the agenda of the person making the distinction between good Jews and bad Jews?
Bibliography
None
Footnotes
None
Citations
American Medical Association (AMA 11th Edition): Jacobsen S. Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews. August 2024; 12(3). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki
American Psychological Association (APA 7th Edition): Jacobsen, S. (2024, August 8). Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews. In-Sight Publishing. 12(3).
Brazilian National Standards (ABNT): JACOBSEN, S. Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews. In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, Fort Langley, v. 12, n. 3, 2024.
Chicago/Turabian, Author-Date (17th Edition): Jacobsen, Scott. 2024. “Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 12, no. 3 (Summer). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki.
Chicago/Turabian, Notes & Bibliography (17th Edition): Jacobsen, S “Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 12, no. 3 (August 2024).http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki.
Harvard: Jacobsen, S. (2024) ‘Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews’, In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, 12(3). <http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki>.
Harvard (Australian): Jacobsen, S 2024, ‘Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews’, In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, <http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki>.
Modern Language Association (MLA, 9th Edition): Jacobsen, Scott. “Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, vo.12, no. 3, 2024, http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki.
Vancouver/ICMJE: Scott J. Conversation with Dr. Alon Milwicki on Good Jews and Bad Jews [Internet]. 2024 Aug; 12(3). Available from: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/milwicki.
License & Copyright
In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. ©Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use or duplication of material without express permission from Scott Douglas Jacobsen strictly prohibited, excerpts and links must use full credit to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with direction to the original content.
In-Sight Publishing 